BATMAN AND ROBIN #14 (review)

Posted on September 16th, 2010 by ekko

I’ve been as hot on Grant Morrison’s Batman and Robin title as I have been on any D.C. title, which is to say, I’ve been luke-warm.  Most of the DCU (Vertigo excluded) just doesn’t rock me.  But B&R has been solid from the beginning, due largely to to the fact that author Grant Morrison hasn’t allowed the book to descend into unexplained “insider” stuff beyond the reach of anybody who hasn’t studied Batman like the Torah.  Morrison typically allows too much to happen between panels (where nobody can see, Grant!) and doesn’t condescend to help new-ish readers follow along (I haven’t read everything you’ve ever written, dude!). But he hasn’t done that in Batman and Robin.  Perhaps it’s because he was there for the launch of issue #1, and really got to define the relationship between the characters?  Or maybe it’s because I was there for the launch of issue #1, so I can follow it better?  Probably a little of both.

Anyway, Morrison makes references to the larger Batverse in this series, but he doesn’t use that mythology to drive the B&R story.  That makes the series fairly self-contained; no small feat in a world where there are at least six other Bat-books on the shelf every month.  I tried to count them once, but I couldn’t find them all among the forest of Deadpool titles.
With issue #14, he’s about 90 pages away from ending his run on the title (he’s leaving to do “Batman, Inc.”) and it looks like he’s (gasp!) actually going to wrap some things up.

The issue has scenes between Damian Wayne Robin and the Joker (at left) that recall the latter’s brutal bludgeoning of the former version of the former, so many years ago.  (It’s a story recounted in the excellent new DVD “Batman: Under the Red Hood.”)  The dialogue is both clever and haunting, which is how Joker ought to be written (but usually isn’t).  Truly, it’s the best Joker stuff I’ve ever read.  In fact, it’s some of the best chilling psychopath stuff I’ve read, period.  And I’ve read a lot of chilling psychopath stuff.

And the art is amazing.  Perhaps the greatest compliment I can give is to say that Frazer Irving doesn’t make me miss Frank Quietly.  I’d say, in fact, that Morrison’s layered “less is more” narrative style works so well in B&R because of the artists.  The flow from panel to panel and page to page have unspoken transitions that help the book read more like a story and less like a series of cool thoughts and ideas (which, frankly, was the biggest weakness with Batman: R.I.P.).  I’m still a little lost in the Pyg storyline, but it’s amusing nonetheless.

The best part of the series is watching Dick Grayson go from solo-offshoot/mature sidekick to mentor and teacher, and watching Damian Wayne respond by going from being a wild, uncontrollable ball of dangerous fury (remember how he acted in issues #1-5?) to being . . . Well, a less uncontrollable ball of fury.  At least he’s willing to talk about it now.  And one suspects that this latest instance of hubris, which leads in issue #14 to Damian being trapped at the mercy of Joker, will help improve his attitude even more.

PICTURE OF THE DAY

Posted on September 15th, 2010 by ekko

THE BIG 3

Posted on September 15th, 2010 by ekko

Out of these three dudes, why is the biggest badass (Iggy) looking like the biggest girl?  And is Lou Reed smiling?  Really??

I Wanna Be Your Dog-Uncle Tupelo

Rock and Roll Suicide-Riko Kiley

Jean Genie-Smashing Pumpkins

Walk on the Wild Side-Joe Strummer

Imagine a Walk on the Wild Side-Lou Reed vs. John Lennon

DARWYN COOKE SLAMS THE MAJOR COMIC BOOK PUBLISHERS

Posted on September 14th, 2010 by ekko

“I want [Marvel and DC] to stop catering to the perverted needs of 45 year old men, I want to stop seeing Batman F***king Black Canary, I don’t want to hear Batman swearing, I don’t want to see him feeding a boy rats. I don’t want to see characters getting raped in the a**, I don’t want to see characters who have been straight for 60 years become lesbians overnight because the writer’s too stupid or uncreative to come up with something decent. I want to see new characters for a new time, and when the industry of superhero comics realizes it’s sights to the young people it was meant for, I’ll be there with both arms and feet outside.”

-Darwyn Cooke, on why he’s not interested in going back to Marvel or D.C. anymore.

I can’t say I disagree, at least not wholly.  I love Marvel comics, don’t get me wrong.  And I appreciate D.C. (even if I barely read it).  I also understand that it is difficult to come up with surprising or interesting changes of events that will move product, and desperate times call for desperate measures.  That was the impetus behind the Ultimate line and All-Star Batman and Robin, both of which committed just about every one of the acts on Cooke’s hate list.

And, frankly, I really like reading new (and even bizarre) takes on standards.  It’s kind of like the comic book version of a cover song.  Sometimes, you get a Marilyn Manson’s “Sweet Dreams,” which is fun to hear a few times but gets old fast.  Other times, you get Hendrix covering Bob Dylan or Aretha’s R.E.S.P.E.C.T., and it takes over the playing field.  The Death of Captain America comes to mind—does anyone really want to see Steve wield the shield again?  I don’t think so.

On the other hand, what Darwyn Cooke, who has created some of the best Justice League work of all time, seems to be saying is that comic books don’t have to resort to cheap sales tricks and “events” to stay artistically valid.  And I agree with that.  Geoff Johns’ extended Teen Titans run and his work on Superman; Brian Michael Bendis’ Daredevil and then his New Avengers books; John Byrne’s Fantastic Four; Garth Ennis’ Punisher MAX; Roger Stern’s Spider-Man . . . Comic book history old and new is replete with examples of writers who emphasized story over event, substance over style, and created lasting, important works of art using well-established characters who left the run not-all-that-different from the way they came in.  Other than being more beloved than before.

Of course, selling those books is getting harder and harder, and that’s what Cooke seems to be missing.

Or is he?  Maybe Marvel and D.C. don’t need to move so much product?  Maybe art is for artists and art lovers, not Hollywood studios and toy designers?  There’s another parallel here to the music industry: In the 1980s and ‘90s, the record studios made a lot of executives—and even some artists—rich.  When the bottom fell out, the music changed–whether it was due to illegal downloading or a bad business model or emerging competing media or a combination of all of the above in a perfect storm.  Music is coming back to being a local thing, a live thing, an indie thing.  Sure, execs will always try to have their hands in the pockets of teeny boppers and teenage girls (and their parents), but tried-and-true bands are finding that if they are willing to live humble, the internet  is a distribution boon—a way to promote their own live shows.  Comic books clearly need to find out how to survive in this new world.  They, too, need a new business model.  And maybe part of it is being willing to be humble, as Cooke suggests: Look less for the next big bang and focus more on creating indelible characters.  Stan Lee was all about that in the beginning—making the ordinary extraordinary, and trying to create a love and excitement that would be infectious to a small target audience.  Lee, Ditko, Kirby, Buscema and the other greats had no idea that what they were doing would survive and thrive to the next century and beyond.

One last thing about Cooke’s comments: Lots of folks are saying they were anti-gay, to which I say: “Huh???”  He didn’t say he didn’t want to see gay characters in comics—hell, he created a gay couple in his work on The Spirit—he said he didn’t want comic book creators to use homosexuality as a manufactured method to boost sales.  Come on, guys, let’s read it in context and not fly off the handle at the mention of a hotbutton word.

What do you all think?

Pass your testking VCP-410 on first attempt using 000-978 and other resources. We offer 100% success in real exam with up to date testking 646-230 prepared by experts. You can also find 312-49 & pass4sure MB2-631 on our site.

ANNUALS-Count the Rings

Posted on September 13th, 2010 by ekko

At the risk of my indie cred, I’m going to admit that I’ve never been a huge fan of Annuals.  At least not since after “Be He Me” their first record on the Ace Fu label.  That release was amazing, but the next two were a little tepid and twee.  But now, with “Count the Rings,” the band roars back with sophisticated, gentle, Yes-like indie pop that truly breaks new ground.  They manage a “big” sound while never seeming like anything other than a little band.  It’s intimate but majestic–important but not self-indulgent.  Clever and catchy but not too smart to alienate the listener.  And best of all, it’s not twee.

This band hasn’t sounded this good in years.

Eyes in the Darkness

PICTURE OF THE DAY

Posted on September 12th, 2010 by ekko

ALPHANAUT-Out Of Orbit

Posted on September 11th, 2010 by ekko

Alphanaut, as you’ve probably already guessed, is a space rock band, but what makes the Alphanaut sound special is that the music doesn’t seem to flow from King Crimson or Pink Floyd.  It’s more Lou Reed and Bowie (and even INXS and Spandau Ballet), with electro accents.  And content-wise, it’s far more idealistic than cosmic.  For example, a song about trouble in the world, “More Than I Do,” asks “You understand this more than I do/Comprehend this more than I do/So please explain to me/Why they are my enemy.”  Yeah, it’s a little ham-handed, but the sentiment is right–and far too uncommon in modern indie music, which tends to avoid global topics in favor of interpersonal ones.

The music is crystal clear–exceptionally well produced–and all of the material is the product of one man, Marc Alan.  That can be good, but it can also lead to a singleness of message and sound that would benefit from group participation.  The album is clearly a labor of love: Mr. Alan’s vision, actualized for your ears.  Towards the end, the album moves away from standard song structure and gets experimental.  This material, like the spacejam break during a Dead show, is actually quite interesting.  In your album tastes, below, I offer one song from each “part” of the album.

Without You

Night Blind

WITS END-Play it by Ear

Posted on September 11th, 2010 by ekko

I’m not sure why these guys remind me of Journey, but they do.  I think it’s Tim Robinson’s vocal tracks.  Anyway, “Play It By Ear” is the latest from this California pop band, whose music crosses the divide between the sounds of the 1980s and 1990s.  It’s on “White Wagon Records,” a lable so tiny I can’t even find it on the interwebs.  But you can find their album at the great and wonderful CD Baby.

Check out a sample track from their latest . . .

From the Weed Patch

Here’s a video from their 2007 album . . .

COMIC BOOK COVER OF THE DAY

Posted on September 10th, 2010 by ekko

No, it’s not real.  It’s from this site.

Navigation

  • Mission Statement

    FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER.
  • FOLLOW ME ON TUMBLR http://www.tumblr.com/tumblelog/berkeleyplace WHAT THE HELL IS BERKELEY PLACE? "Berkeley Place" has been a blog since 2000.
  • Berkeley Place is also 6 blocks of Brooklyn real estate, emerging from Sackett St. and ending at Banana Hill, a small park that grows a foot each year from dog shit and the corpses of dead rats. Though its residents have gotten wealthier over the decades, Berkeley Place still houses folks of all backgrounds with interests in, well, everything.
  • WHAT THE HELL GOES ON HERE? Ekko reviews independent music, comic books, and whatever else interests him.
  • WHAT THE HELL IS INDIE MUSIC? An independent record label (or indie record label) is a record label operating without the funding of or outside the organizations of the major record labels. - Wikipedia.org That means they ain't in the RIAA, dude.

    HOW CAN I GET IN ON THIS?

    • Email me
      for the specifics but, basically:
    • I listen to all submissions of entire albums, not songs or compilations.
    • With rare exceptions I will not review material protected by the RIAA. So Sony, BMG, etc., don't start sending me crap. I'm not interested.
    • I don't listen to streams.
    • I won't read online comic-books. I may read .pdfs. I will read all hardcopy submissions.
    • I will review only submissions that I can recommend. I'm not here to do negative reviews.
    • Contact me to tell me to remove something. I'll take it down within 24 hours.
  • Comic Blog Elite
  • Tags!

  • Archives

  • I’M HYPED!

  • MMN

    Blog Directory Music Blogs Catlog Privacy Policy Quantcast Tag Blog Directory
  • 1.12.15/11.21.12

  • Copyright © 2009 Berkeley Place. Theme by THAT Agency but customised by Primitive. Powered by WordPress.